2014 RETS-REMP & Groundwater Workshop, June 23-27, 2014, Westin Savannah, Savannah, GA
Sponsored by Nuclear Energy Institute


Jason Jang Award
Position Papers
Past Workshops
CHP Credit
Steering Committee
Contact Us
Workshop Links
Technical Links
Files and Software


Assessment of the Molecular Separations Inc. (MSI)

Tritium Resin Separation (TRS) Process

Naughton, Michael EPRI; Snead, Paul*, CP&L,

Bushart, Sean, EPRI; Furlong, Lou, MSI

The TRS is a proprietary process for the preferential removal of tritium from liquids. The process has been shown to selectively load tritiated water (HTO) through the hydration of a conditioned resin media. Early laboratory tests conducted at Washington State University and Clemson Environmental Technology Laboratory confirmed the selective adsorption of tritiated water (HTO) by means of the TRS process.

Based on these findings, EPRI initiated a research project with CP&L to evaluate the TRS process. This goal was to extend earlier results of laboratory experiments to a size that would allow reasonable scale up to commercial processing. Additionally, various tasks were designed to define key process parameters and uncover limiting conditions that would adversely affect the process.

Major findings of the EPRI Assessment Test Program:

  1. The Tritium Resin Separation Process does selectively remove tritium from solution by a hydration mechanism. Removal efficiency rates ranged from 0 to 39% in beaker and column tests. The highest removal rates were seen in tests using an inorganic exchange resin.
  2. At this point the TRS Process has not been shown to be an economically viable process technology. The present technology can be characterized as having extremely short runs, long drying cycles and relatively low tritium removal efficiency per cycle. Further development work is needed for a commercially viable process.
  3. Test results confirmed the requirement of complete removal of ionic and organic contaminants prior to the process.
  4. The proposed use of an organic exchange resin resulted in a major failure due to rapid degradation of the media due to drying temperature. The use of an inorganic resin is recommended for future trials.
  5. Operation of the test columns as a "fluidized bed" resulted in a major loss in the tritium decontamination factor and did not allow for the determination of the final tritium removal capacity for the media.

A full EPRI report containing the results and conclusions from this testing will be available to EPRI members. Although this study did not demonstrate that this process, as tested, is currently ready to be used for tritiated water treatment in the Nuclear Power industry, it did show that the process does indeed selectively remove tritium from preconditioned wastewater. EPRI is willing to work with utilities in the future to further develop this technology for their use, through laboratory or field pilot demonstrations.

*Presenting Author


North American Technical Center
Last Updated 03/13/2002

Contact Webmaster